San Cristobal (Clasico) – Robusto (5 x 50)
Jan 27, 2026Cigar Reviews
The Particulars
| wdt_created_by | cigarkey | brand | cigarname | vitola | strength | wrapper | binder | filler | infused | sweettip | origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mcclossm | San Cristobal (Clasico) - Robusto (5 x 50) | San Cristobal | San Cristobal (Clasico) | Robusto - 5.00" x 50 | Full | Ecuadorian Habano, Oscuro | Nicaragua | Nicaragua | No | No | My Father Cigars S.A., Nicaragua |
| COMPANY / BRAND: | San Cristobal |
| CIGAR: | San Cristobal (Clasico) |
| VITOLA: | Robusto - 5.00" x 50 |
| STRENGTH: | Full |
| WRAPPER: | Ecuadorian Habano, Oscuro |
| BINDER: | Nicaragua |
| FILLER: | Nicaragua |
| INFUSED: | No |
| SWEET TIP: | No |
| ORIGIN: | My Father Cigars S.A., Nicaragua |
Prolegomenon and Other Random Thoughts
San Cristobal is the more moderately priced line-up from the Ashton Family of cigars and made by My Father and blending by Jose ‘Pepin’ Garcia, So is there a better place to start than with the original blend?
| Journaling Date | Cigar | Appearance | Draw | Burn | Flavors | Overall Experience | Base Rating | Buy Again? | Final Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-03 | San Cristobal (Clasico) - Robusto (5 x 50) | 5.00 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 9.50 | |||||
| 2026-01-26 | San Cristobal (Clasico) - Robusto (5 x 50) | Good | Good | Great | Excellent | Excellent | 5.00 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 9.50 |
The Review
This review for the San Cristobal (Clasico) - Robusto (5 x 50) is based on the journal entry dated 2026-01-26
Appearance & Construction (0-3): Good (3)
The OG San Cristobal is a fantastic-looking cigar. The Oscuro Ecuadorian Havana wrapper has a nice chocolatey color to it that’s complemented with good sheen, mottling, oil spots, and a ton of tooth. There’s nice color variation at the veins where they are a lighter brown, giving it the look of worn leather. All of the veins are nice and thin, resulting in clean, tight seams and a beautifully applied triple cap. It’s set off with the beautifully done San Cristobal band accentuated with embossed gold accents and their signature papagallo.
Draw (0-3) & Burn (0-4): Good (3) / Great (4)
The draw has a little bit of extra resistance to it but is good, while the burn starts beautifully. The ash is a light gray that is almost white in sections and contrasted by dark striations while being speckled with oil crystals. It’s a fairly tight ash that holds together with minimal cracking. The burn line is razor-sharp and gorgeous. It’s dead even from side to side with only the slightest hint of wave to it. The ash holds through the first third all while retaining that beautiful burn line.
Flavor Profile (0-5): Excellent (5)
The cigar starts off mildly with bits of earth, baking spice, dark chocolate, leather, and cedar. Nothing too crazy, but quite pleasant. Then I start to pick up a bit of a black cherry that mixes with a little bit of honey for the sweet. Spice is very mild at the moment and there’s a nice creaminess on the finish. This cigar is starting off quite refined, but it does have about 1.5 years of age to it at this point.
Roughly an inch in, flavor intensity has picked up nicely. Spice is still on the milder side of medium, but it’s a nice red pepper that’s starting to tingle the tongue and the roof of my mouth. I occasionally get some cinnamon to the flavor but it’s mostly pepper. Dark chocolate and coffee are also ramping up and helping to drive the profile, and thick, syrupy raisin complements the black cherry. Complexity is hitting full stride and the flavors on this one are just swirling. And not one hint of harshness, just smooth refinement and a delightfully creamy finish.
With the final third, there’s one more uptick in coffee and earth flavors while woody notes get more charred. The sweetness has pulled back just slightly, but this is still a dynamic and complex blend that just satisfies. All the while red pepper is still delivering a pleasant burn to the tongue.
Overall Experience (0-5): Excellent (5)
The San Cristobal Robusto vitola may be called the Clasico, but it definitely qualifies as a classic. And given the relatively affordable price that these go for, this is an excellent option if you’re looking for a good but approachable Nicaraguan puro.
Review Base Rating (0-5):
5.00
Would I Buy It Again?
Signs point to yes (recommended)
Review Final Score (0-10):
9.50
Overall Score and Individual Journal Entries
While the review is based off one instance of journaling this cigar; there’s a number of reasons you can have different experiences smoking the same cigar multiple times. A blend can evolve with age (for better or worse), palates evolves, preferences change, and sometimes you just get a bad example! This section captures the ratings from each journal entry and the related journal photo. Below you’ll find an aggregate score based on every time the cigar has been journaled. Unless it was a gift or on-off smoke, this section will be updated every time I journal this cigar!
| Times Journaled | Base Rating | Buy Again? | Final Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 5.00 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 9.50 |
| Journaling Date | Cigar | Appearance | Draw | Burn | Flavors | Overall Experience | Base Rating | Buy Again? | Final Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-03 | San Cristobal (Clasico) - Robusto (5 x 50) | 5.00 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 9.50 | |||||
| 2026-01-26 | San Cristobal (Clasico) - Robusto (5 x 50) | Good | Good | Great | Excellent | Excellent | 5.00 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 9.50 |
Journaling Photos
The Flavor Wheel
| Category | Strength |
|---|---|
| Baking Spice | 2.00 |
| Pepper | 3.00 |
| Coffee / Espresso | 2.00 |
| Anise / Licorice | 0.00 |
| Sweet | 3.00 |
| Chocolate | 2.00 |
| Bready / Toasty | 1.00 |
| Woody / Charred | 3.00 |
| Grass / Hay | 0.00 |
| Earth | 2.00 |
| Leather | 1.00 |
| Floral / Aromatic | 0.00 |
| Fruity | 3.00 |
| Nutty | 1.00 |
| Salty / Mineral | 0.00 |
| Creamy | 3.00 |
| Musty / Barnyard | 1.00 |
| Bitter | 0.00 |
| Smooth | 3.00 |
| Harsh | 0.00 |
With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience. These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out. When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.
The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.
- 0: No flavor detected
- 1: Mild flavor
- 2: Medium flavor
- 3: Strong flavor
Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.
With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience. These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out. When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.
The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.
- 0: No flavor detected
- 1: Mild flavor
- 2: Medium flavor
- 3: Strong flavor
Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.
| Category | Strength |
|---|---|
| Baking Spice | 2.00 |
| Pepper | 3.00 |
| Coffee / Espresso | 2.00 |
| Anise / Licorice | 0.00 |
| Sweet | 3.00 |
| Chocolate | 2.00 |
| Bready / Toasty | 1.00 |
| Woody / Charred | 3.00 |
| Grass / Hay | 0.00 |
| Earth | 2.00 |
| Leather | 1.00 |
| Floral / Aromatic | 0.00 |
| Fruity | 3.00 |
| Nutty | 1.00 |
| Salty / Mineral | 0.00 |
| Creamy | 3.00 |
| Musty / Barnyard | 1.00 |
| Bitter | 0.00 |
| Smooth | 3.00 |
| Harsh | 0.00 |
Questions on how the ratings work?
Check out the detailed explanation here.
Want to Comment?
Leave a comment on the source IG post
