Oscar Valladares The Oscar Habano – Toro (6 x 52)

Jul 24, 2026Cigar Reviews

The Particulars

wdt_created_by cigarkey brand cigarname vitola strength wrapper binder filler infused sweettip origin
mcclossm Oscar Valladares The Oscar Habano - Toro (6 x 52) Oscar Valladares The Oscar Habano Toro - 6.00" x 52 Medium - Full Ecuadorian Habano, Natural Honduras Honduras / Nicaragua No No Oscar Valladares Tobacco & Co., Honduras
COMPANY / BRAND: Oscar Valladares
CIGAR: The Oscar Habano
VITOLA: Toro - 6.00" x 52
STRENGTH: Medium - Full
WRAPPER: Ecuadorian Habano, Natural
BINDER: Honduras
FILLER: Honduras / Nicaragua
INFUSED: No
SWEET TIP: No
ORIGIN: Oscar Valladares Tobacco & Co., Honduras

Prolegomenon and Other Random Thoughts

My review queue is an overblown mess—a burden I will gladly suffer through. But choosing what to review next is always the biggest challenge. Do I go by what has been sitting the longest before it sits too long? Do I go by what’s hot and new that people want to know about ASAP? Do I go by whatever I’m feeling and is easy to get to? Usually, it’s a juggling act of all three, but my stash of The Oscar decided to make the decision for me by violently pushing to the front of the line. How? Two of the four started growing mold. 🤬

Now, before the humidor police jump into the comments to tell me I’m not storing my cigars properly: I have many, many, many cigars, and they are all meticulously kept at 65-69% RH in a room that sits at 68 degrees year-round. I don’t want to name names, but the only time I ever experience mold is with naked cigars that come from a certain mail-order retailer… let’s just say they have a page dedicated to cigars. I firmly subscribe to the notion that naked cigars are wildly susceptible to temperature and humidity shock in transit, making them way more likely to develop fuzz. Put me down permanently for Team Cellophane.

Luckily, one of each blend of The Oscar avoided this tragic fate, so I decided it would be best to smoke them ASAP before the spores came for them, too. Because of this little humidor massacre, we only have one example each of the Habano and Maduro blends to base these reviews on.

Journaling Date Cigar Appearance Draw Burn Flavors Overall Experience Burnable? Base Rating Final Score Comments
2026-04-08 Oscar Valladares The Oscar Habano - Toro (6 x 52) Good Average Good Great Great Most likely (good stick, but look for a deal) 4.00 7.67

The Review

This review for the Oscar Valladares The Oscar Habano - Toro (6 x 52) is based on the journal entry dated 2026-04-08

 

Appearance & Construction (0-3):  Good (3)

For being the non-maduro version of this cigar, it’s already quite dark—what most people would consider a Maduro color, honestly. But this dark, milk-chocolate brown is the true color of the Habano, and when you compare it side-by-side to the super dark Maduro version, you can see why. It has a softer texture with a light tooth and mild mottling. That soft texture is a bit deceiving, as it does have a light sheen to it and is definitely not dry. The seams are tight, the veins are minimal and super thin, and it has good density and firmness with a clean triple cap. I like the aqua and gold die-cut band, but I haaaaate that they wrap these in a candela leaf. Sure, it’s fun and serves as a visual differentiator on the shelf, but it’s a dry and crumbly leaf, there’s no cello, and it makes it much harder to stack them in your humidor. It’s just messy and offers way less protection than standard cellophane.​

 

Draw (0-3) & Burn (0-4):  Average (2) / Good (3)

The draw is on the tight side, but not so much that I’m running for the draw tool just yet. The burn starts clean and even, giving me the immediate sense that this will be a slower burn. The char line itself is very crisp but goes between dead-flat and uneven, then back again, but with little to no waviness. It’s a textbook-looking burn line when it decides to stay even. The ash is a very light gray with a lot of dark gray splotches mixed in. Striations and cracks are both tight, reflecting the slower burn. The ash holds on into the second third before falling, but the draw never improves, staying on the tighter side throughout. The burn line gets more out of sorts after ashing and needs a correction as well.

 

Flavor Profile (0-5):  Great (4)

Initial flavors are heavy on earth, peanut shells, baking cocoa, and baking spice. There’s a chalkiness to the baking cocoa that gives it a dry mouthfeel. What’s interesting is that there’s a cola-like flavor to the sweetness. Now, I know you know what cola tastes like, but it’s really a combination of citrus, vanilla, cinnamon, nutmeg, and caramel. But this is like your budget RC Cola, not Coca-Cola. I’m getting some very light pepper, but the woody notes and baking cocoa really do keep the profile on the drier side. As I get through the first inch, it becomes more citrusy and acidic on the sweet notes.

With the second third, flavors are mostly holding steady. Medium earth, light leather, a stronger chalky baking cocoa, peanut shells, and spice are the main drivers. But right at the midpoint, the cola sweetness starts turning into raisin, and the black pepper increases. The dryness of the blend is turning more savory, and it’s getting a slight charred flavor to the wood. Mild mesquite notes are kicking in. It’s a welcome transition, as the cola and cedar mix was getting a little stale. While there isn’t much of a creamy finish—it’s still firmly on the dry side—the savory qualities are improving with the raisin sweetness and charred notes, along with heavy cinnamon and black pepper. There’s even a mild peatiness and the occasional sour note to change things up. The overall complexity is on point and well-balanced.

The final third sees an additional uptick in black pepper, once again leaving a burning sensation on the tongue and lips. The raisin sweetness is pulling back sharply as well, but the rest remains largely unchanged, dominated by that strong mesquite flavor. There’s just been one note in the blend I haven’t fully loved, even though this is a pretty enjoyable cigar overall. It’s somewhere between sour, bitter, and leather—odd, right? Let’s call it mildly acrid. But it increases in the final third and leaves an aftertaste. There’s no ammonia or tar anywhere; it’s just a bit of funk. But it’s a minor quibble in an overall fantastic blend.

 

Overall Experience (0-5):  Great (4)

There are times where The Oscar shines, and others where it’s a bit off-putting. The good moments far outweigh the bad ones, though. Those off-putting notes aren’t enough to kick Oscar to the curb, but just enough that I’m not exactly running to smoke this cigar again. This would be a cigar better paired with a peaty scotch that could intentionally mask some of those mild off-notes.

 

Review Base Rating (0-5):

4.00

 

Is it Burnable?

Most likely (good stick, but look for a deal)

 

Review Final Score (0-10):

7.67

 

Overall Score and Individual Journal Entries

While the review is based off one instance of journaling this cigar; there’s a number of reasons you can have different experiences smoking the same cigar multiple times. A blend can evolve with age (for better or worse), palates evolves, preferences change, and sometimes you just get a bad example!  This section captures the ratings from each journal entry and the related journal photo.  Below you’ll find an aggregate score based on every time the cigar has been journaled. Unless it was a gift or on-off smoke, this section will be updated every time I journal this cigar!

Times Journaled Base Rating Burnable? Final Score
1 4.00 Most likely (good stick, but look for a deal) 7.67
Journaling Date Cigar Appearance Draw Burn Flavors Overall Experience Burnable? Base Rating Final Score Comments
2026-04-08 Oscar Valladares The Oscar Habano - Toro (6 x 52) Good Average Good Great Great Most likely (good stick, but look for a deal) 4.00 7.67

Journaling Photos

The Flavor Wheel

Category Strength
Baking Spice 3.00
Pepper 2.00
Coffee / Espresso 1.00
Anise / Licorice 0.00
Sweet 3.00
Chocolate 3.00
Bready / Toasty 2.00
Woody / Charred 3.00
Grass / Hay 0.00
Earth 2.00
Leather 1.00
Floral / Aromatic 1.00
Fruity 3.00
Nutty 2.00
Salty / Mineral 1.00
Creamy 1.00
Musty / Barnyard 0.00
Bitter 1.00
Smooth 2.00
Harsh 1.00

With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience.  These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out.  When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.

The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.

  • 0:   No flavor detected
  • 1:   Mild flavor
  • 2:   Medium flavor
  • 3:   Strong flavor

Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.

With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience.  These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out.  When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.

The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.

  • 0:   No flavor detected
  • 1:   Mild flavor
  • 2:   Medium flavor
  • 3:   Strong flavor

Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.

Category Strength
Baking Spice 3.00
Pepper 2.00
Coffee / Espresso 1.00
Anise / Licorice 0.00
Sweet 3.00
Chocolate 3.00
Bready / Toasty 2.00
Woody / Charred 3.00
Grass / Hay 0.00
Earth 2.00
Leather 1.00
Floral / Aromatic 1.00
Fruity 3.00
Nutty 2.00
Salty / Mineral 1.00
Creamy 1.00
Musty / Barnyard 0.00
Bitter 1.00
Smooth 2.00
Harsh 1.00

Questions on how the ratings work?

Check out the detailed explanation here.

Want to Comment?

Leave a comment on our Facebook page.