J. London Pink Telephone Booth – Lancero (6.75 x 42)

Jul 9, 2026Cigar Reviews

The Particulars

wdt_created_by cigarkey brand cigarname vitola strength wrapper binder filler infused sweettip origin
mcclossm J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) J. London Pink Telephone Booth Lancero - 6.75" x 42 Medium - Full Ecuadorian Habano, Maduro (Aged 3.5-Yrs) Dominican Republic (Olor Viso) Dominican Republic No No Tejada, Dominican Republic
COMPANY / BRAND: J. London
CIGAR: Pink Telephone Booth
VITOLA: Lancero - 6.75" x 42
STRENGTH: Medium - Full
WRAPPER: Ecuadorian Habano, Maduro (Aged 3.5-Yrs)
BINDER: Dominican Republic (Olor Viso)
FILLER: Dominican Republic
INFUSED: No
SWEET TIP: No
ORIGIN: Tejada, Dominican Republic

Prolegomenon and Other Random Thoughts

The J. London Pink Telephone Booth is a cigar that is no longer available for sale.  I figured, I might as well get that out of the way now, you can stop reading if you’re looking for one.   I’m doing this out of love for the blend and a cigar that turned me onto Lanceros, to share a cigar a number of people probably missed and bring back fond memories for those who got to enjoy it.  The original Pink Telephone Booth was a short Robusto that debuted in 2023, but Jonathan Fiant of J. London always felt the blend would really shine as Lancero.  At TPE 2025, Kyle from LA Cigar Collective had the opportunity to try an example and decided to purchase all 190 bundles, making it a shop exclusive.  They eventually sold through the entire stock by early 2026, which is great for them, but bad for anybody who never go tot try one.   I initially thought about revisiting the review since it’s on the brief side.  That would mean rewriting it so I opted to keep the the original with all the naivety and tone from 2025 when I first smoked it.  Oh young(er) Sean, still so optimistic and carefree, unaware of where this cigar journey would take him….

But anyway, this cigar slaps and it deserves its time in the sun.  So I’m publishing the review I originally posted to Facebook and Kyle posted as a blog entry to the LACC website.

Journaling Date Cigar Appearance Draw Burn Flavors Overall Experience Burnable? Base Rating Final Score Comments
2025-05-11 J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) Average Good Good Excellent Great Signs point to yes (recommended) 4.25 8.50
2025-06-09 J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) Average Good Great Excellent Excellent Signs point to yes (recommended) 4.75 9.17
2025-08-03 J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) Good Good Great Great Great Signs point to yes (recommended) 4.50 8.83
2026-01-20 J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) Good Good Good Excellent Excellent Signs point to yes (recommended) 4.75 9.17
2026-05-26 J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) Good Good Average Excellent Excellent Signs point to yes (recommended) 4.50 8.83 Accidentally knocked the ash before first lit photo

The Review

This review for the J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) is based on the journal entry dated 2025-05-11

This seemed like a good choice for Mother’s Day. If you’re unsure why, well, you can thank your dad connecting a long-distance call in your mom’s pink telephone booth for the fact that you’re here in this world. 😅 ba dum tiss 🥁

Admittedly, Lanceros are not in my comfort zone, but they strike me as a bit of a connoisseur’s vitola. They’re a really great way to savor the wrapper with less binder and filler tobacco. But as a proud member of the big-hand club, these smaller ring gauges always feel a little like I’m holding a toothpick. While the Pink Telephone Booth blend itself is not limited, the Lancero vitola is an exclusive to LA Cigar Collective, located right in our backyard just outside of New Orleans

 

Appearance & Construction (0-3):  Average (2)

The Habano wrapper is super dark, has good oiliness, and features a lot of mottling. There’s an interesting dichotomy of a “crispiness” to the wrapper while still being so oily you can feel the residue on your fingers. It is definitely not dry, though; the HumidiMeter checked in at 62%. It is a bit rustic, however. It’s lumpy and slightly curved, with a couple of thick veins and some lift at the seams. The pigtail only accentuates the rustic vibe. But I really dig the teal and pink color combo on the band.

 

Draw (0-3) & Burn (0-4):  Good (3) / Good (3)

The draw is on the open side, but good. The burn is uneven through the first inch, but stays controlled enough to avoid canoeing. I always find these smaller ring gauges are tougher to burn evenly. The ash is a very light gray that develops dark, deep grooves between draws. By the end of the first third, the char settles into a nice, even line. The ash barely holds on through the first third, but there are no surprises there. Stacking ash isn’t a strong suit of the small-ring gang.

 

Flavor Profile (0-5):  Excellent (5)

Immediate flavors are musty earth, light pepper, and a citrusy sweetness. I’m getting espresso and light chocolate as well. I get a little bit of salt from the wrapper when my tongue touches where the leaf was resting on my lips. This blend is off to a great start. There’s some charred woodiness, but it adds a smoky quality to the earth rather than overpowering it. The sweetness is interesting; there’s a bit of zest, but I’m also getting a very savory, butter-like flavor to it.

The pepper increases with the smoke, approaching 🌶️💣 status. This is a very robust set of flavors, as well as a strong cigar for its size. But it’s a straight-shooter—no real major transitions from start to finish, just increasing intensity and a delightful blend of flavors. The savory, buttery note, along with the espresso, spice, and musty earth—all wrapped in a creamy finish—just absolutely dominate.

 

Overall Experience (0-5):  Great (4)

A great and enjoyable blend, but I’m still not completely sold on Lanceros. The biggest issue now is that I want it in a Toro vitola that just doesn’t exist. 😅 And now I’m also very interested in the other Telephone Booth blends. The pursuit of new and interesting cigars never ends! Check this one out if you can. 🔥

 

 

Review Base Rating (0-5):

4.25

 

Is it Burnable?

Signs point to yes (recommended)

 

Review Final Score (0-10):

8.50

 

Postscript

So yeah, it absolutely sucks this cigar is no longer on the market… I loved it and now I love Lanceros.   Luckily I still have more in my reserves, but eventually they’ll be gone for good. 😭

Overall Score and Individual Journal Entries

While the review is based off one instance of journaling this cigar; there’s a number of reasons you can have different experiences smoking the same cigar multiple times. A blend can evolve with age (for better or worse), palates evolves, preferences change, and sometimes you just get a bad example!  This section captures the ratings from each journal entry and the related journal photo.  Below you’ll find an aggregate score based on every time the cigar has been journaled. Unless it was a gift or on-off smoke, this section will be updated every time I journal this cigar!

Times Journaled Base Rating Burnable? Final Score
5 4.55 Signs point to yes (recommended) 8.90
Journaling Date Cigar Appearance Draw Burn Flavors Overall Experience Burnable? Base Rating Final Score Comments
2025-05-11 J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) Average Good Good Excellent Great Signs point to yes (recommended) 4.25 8.50
2025-06-09 J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) Average Good Great Excellent Excellent Signs point to yes (recommended) 4.75 9.17
2025-08-03 J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) Good Good Great Great Great Signs point to yes (recommended) 4.50 8.83
2026-01-20 J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) Good Good Good Excellent Excellent Signs point to yes (recommended) 4.75 9.17
2026-05-26 J. London Pink Telephone Booth - Lancero (6.75 x 42) Good Good Average Excellent Excellent Signs point to yes (recommended) 4.50 8.83 Accidentally knocked the ash before first lit photo

Journaling Photos

The Flavor Wheel

Category Strength
Baking Spice 2.00
Pepper 1.80
Coffee / Espresso 2.00
Anise / Licorice 1.00
Sweet 2.80
Chocolate 1.60
Bready / Toasty 2.20
Woody / Charred 1.60
Grass / Hay 0.40
Earth 2.40
Leather 0.80
Floral / Aromatic 0.60
Fruity 2.20
Nutty 0.60
Salty / Mineral 1.00
Creamy 2.80
Musty / Barnyard 1.60
Bitter 0.40
Smooth 2.00
Harsh 0.00

With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience.  These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out.  When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.

The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.

  • 0:   No flavor detected
  • 1:   Mild flavor
  • 2:   Medium flavor
  • 3:   Strong flavor

Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.

With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience.  These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out.  When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.

The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.

  • 0:   No flavor detected
  • 1:   Mild flavor
  • 2:   Medium flavor
  • 3:   Strong flavor

Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.

Category Strength
Baking Spice 2.00
Pepper 1.80
Coffee / Espresso 2.00
Anise / Licorice 1.00
Sweet 2.80
Chocolate 1.60
Bready / Toasty 2.20
Woody / Charred 1.60
Grass / Hay 0.40
Earth 2.40
Leather 0.80
Floral / Aromatic 0.60
Fruity 2.20
Nutty 0.60
Salty / Mineral 1.00
Creamy 2.80
Musty / Barnyard 1.60
Bitter 0.40
Smooth 2.00
Harsh 0.00

Questions on how the ratings work?

Check out the detailed explanation here.

Want to Comment?

Leave a comment on our Facebook page.