Definition Conception (Burgundy Band) – Toro (Box Press) (6.5 x 54)
Mar 1, 2026Cigar Reviews
The Particulars
| wdt_created_by | cigarkey | brand | cigarname | vitola | strength | wrapper | binder | filler | infused | sweettip | origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mcclossm | Definition Conception (Burgundy Band) - Toro (Box Press) (6.5 x 54) | Definition | Conception (Burgundy Band) | Box Pressed Toro - 6.50" x 54 | Full | Ecuadorian, Maduro | Nicaragua | Nicaragua (Ometepe) | No | No | Fabrica de Tabacalera, Nicaragua |
| COMPANY / BRAND: | Definition |
| CIGAR: | Conception (Burgundy Band) |
| VITOLA: | Box Pressed Toro - 6.50" x 54 |
| STRENGTH: | Full |
| WRAPPER: | Ecuadorian, Maduro |
| BINDER: | Nicaragua |
| FILLER: | Nicaragua (Ometepe) |
| INFUSED: | No |
| SWEET TIP: | No |
| ORIGIN: | Fabrica de Tabacalera, Nicaragua |
Prolegomenon and Other Random Thoughts
According to Definition, the Conception was named as a salute to the Ometepe leaf used in this cigar. If you’re not sure what the relationship is, Ometepe is an island formed from two volcanoes in the middle of Lake Nicaragua, one of those two volcanoes being named Concepción. Taa-daa…. now you get it. 😉
| Journaling Date | Cigar | Appearance | Draw | Burn | Flavors | Overall Experience | Base Rating | Buy Again? | Final Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-09 | Definition Conception (Burgundy Band) - Toro (Box Press) (6.5 x 54) | Good | Good | Good | Great | Excellent | 4.50 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 8.83 |
The Review
This review for the Definition Conception (Burgundy Band) - Toro (Box Press) (6.5 x 54) is based on the journal entry dated 2025-09-09
Appearance & Construction (0-3): Good (3)
The good folks at Definition really love their Maduros and the Conception is no exception (look at that rhyme 😅). This is a great-looking cigar with a medium box press. You might even say its complexion is a dark chocolate brown with a strong sheen and heavy mottling. It’s oily enough that it leaves a residue on your fingers, to which I have no objection. There are only a few veins and the ones that are present are pressed flat, so there’s no projection. The seams are tight, blending in with a clean and even cap. The burgundy used for the band is a beautiful reception, complementing the slight dark Rosado of the wrapper. Definition’s woven bands make their cigars stand out in the crowd for a pleasing perception. Ok, I’m done. 😅
Draw (0-3) & Burn (0-4): Good (3) / Good (3)
The draw is spot on and the burn starts off nicely with a crisp, even char line. The ash is a nearly white, light gray that keeps a fairly smooth surface with minimal cracking. This one is a bit of a smoke bomb, putting out a ton of thick smoke during and between puffs. What’s interesting is at the burn line, the wrapper is developing a lighter brown stripe where it’s hot, but not yet burning. I’ve seen that in other Maduros, but it’s more visible and dramatic here. The burn line never gets dead even, and it needs several relights due to going out, but no corrections were needed.
Flavor Profile (0-5): Great (4)
Mmm… Rich chocolate right off the bat. A good mix of sweetness follows up—that dark fruit raisin or black cherry type of sweet. There’s a damp, musty, and earthy base with some charred wood flavors. Mild spice starts with hints of pepper that slowly builds, and baking spice is slowly lagging behind. But it’s all wrapped up in a very rich, creamy finish and this is a smooth operator.
Pepper sneaks up with the slow build in the second third. It doesn’t hit you with immediate spice, but I’m finding a mild-to-medium lingering tingle that’s building with time. The chocolate, dark fruit sweet, and woody notes are still the driving trio, but I get a light licorice and some stronger hits of espresso at times. Between that and the dark chocolate, you get that natural and enjoyable bitter note with them. Dark, rich, earthy, creamy, and sweet—it’s just pulling enough complexity.
The final third sees a slight step back in the sweet and chocolate, with more charred wood and earth and pepper. I would have loved to have the sweet pull hard until the end, but this is still a very enjoyable blend. The dominant flavors are robust, but for a full-bodied cigar, I’m finding this is very chill and it’s not going to beat you up with overwhelming nicotine or aggressive spice.
Overall Experience (0-5): Excellent (5)
This cigar reminded me of the Plasencia Alma del Fuego and I think the Ometepe they both use is really defining the profile in both cases. That’s a hell of a comparison considering this is half the price of the Plasencia, so if you enjoy that cigar, I would definitely give this a go. This is a limited release so don’t miss it!
Review Base Rating (0-5):
4.50
Would I Buy It Again?
Signs point to yes (recommended)
Review Final Score (0-10):
8.83
Overall Score and Individual Journal Entries
While the review is based off one instance of journaling this cigar; there’s a number of reasons you can have different experiences smoking the same cigar multiple times. A blend can evolve with age (for better or worse), palates evolves, preferences change, and sometimes you just get a bad example! This section captures the ratings from each journal entry and the related journal photo. Below you’ll find an aggregate score based on every time the cigar has been journaled. Unless it was a gift or on-off smoke, this section will be updated every time I journal this cigar!
| Times Journaled | Base Rating | Buy Again? | Final Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.50 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 8.83 |
| Journaling Date | Cigar | Appearance | Draw | Burn | Flavors | Overall Experience | Base Rating | Buy Again? | Final Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-09 | Definition Conception (Burgundy Band) - Toro (Box Press) (6.5 x 54) | Good | Good | Good | Great | Excellent | 4.50 | Signs point to yes (recommended) | 8.83 |
Journaling Photos
The Flavor Wheel
| Category | Strength |
|---|---|
| Baking Spice | 0.00 |
| Pepper | 2.00 |
| Coffee / Espresso | 2.00 |
| Anise / Licorice | 1.00 |
| Sweet | 3.00 |
| Chocolate | 3.00 |
| Bready / Toasty | 1.00 |
| Woody / Charred | 3.00 |
| Grass / Hay | 0.00 |
| Earth | 2.00 |
| Leather | 1.00 |
| Floral / Aromatic | 1.00 |
| Fruity | 3.00 |
| Nutty | 0.00 |
| Salty / Mineral | 1.00 |
| Creamy | 3.00 |
| Musty / Barnyard | 2.00 |
| Bitter | 1.00 |
| Smooth | 3.00 |
| Harsh | 0.00 |
With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience. These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out. When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.
The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.
- 0: No flavor detected
- 1: Mild flavor
- 2: Medium flavor
- 3: Strong flavor
Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.
With every cigar I journal, I capture simple ratings of the basic flavor categories that I experience. These are more generalized than what you would see in a review, but a distinct profile can still be built out. When multiple instances of the same cigar have been journaled, the scores are averaged out in an attempt to build a reliable flavor profile based on my palate.
The values entered for the strength of each flavor range from 0 to 3.
- 0: No flavor detected
- 1: Mild flavor
- 2: Medium flavor
- 3: Strong flavor
Note: desktop / large screens will see a flavor wheel while mobile / small screens will see a bar chart.
| Category | Strength |
|---|---|
| Baking Spice | 0.00 |
| Pepper | 2.00 |
| Coffee / Espresso | 2.00 |
| Anise / Licorice | 1.00 |
| Sweet | 3.00 |
| Chocolate | 3.00 |
| Bready / Toasty | 1.00 |
| Woody / Charred | 3.00 |
| Grass / Hay | 0.00 |
| Earth | 2.00 |
| Leather | 1.00 |
| Floral / Aromatic | 1.00 |
| Fruity | 3.00 |
| Nutty | 0.00 |
| Salty / Mineral | 1.00 |
| Creamy | 3.00 |
| Musty / Barnyard | 2.00 |
| Bitter | 1.00 |
| Smooth | 3.00 |
| Harsh | 0.00 |
Questions on how the ratings work?
Check out the detailed explanation here.
Want to Comment?
Leave a comment on the source IG post
